Page 1 of 1
Death Events
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:02 pm
by Brochgale
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 4:20 pm
by soloswolf
HE lost it?

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:05 pm
by Brochgale
Yep - I was little shocked - ran smack into a huge yank army at Lex in Kentucky and he only gets wounded - lose one of my Corps commanders killed and 2 division generals killed - I cant find them RR anyhwere on map - assumed htey killed in Action - the rest wounded - ouch

leure: So I figure a death event for ASJ is only suitable in the circumastances

leure:

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:35 pm
by GShock
Misery mustn't die.
...But A.S. Johnston should.
There has to be some competition and striving for that 3*** rank that builds a new Army. Besides, all leaders could die of sickness. If Johnston died from wounds in history why shouldn't he die in AACW?

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:24 pm
by Brochgale
GShock wrote:Misery mustn't die.
...But A.S. Johnston should.
There has to be some competition and striving for that 3*** rank that builds a new Army. Besides, all leaders could die of sickness. If Johnston died from wounds in history why shouldn't he die in AACW?
I am somewhat compensated by the fact that he has lost a good level of senioity and can promote another General to Command the new Army I am building - assuming I get the time to do so but I would not bet on it - I have nothing between Lexigton and Atlanta but Militia - as the rmaining Corp of the Teneessee is very unerstrength, to stop Feds Army which despite heavy losses is still a operable force - Oh well it is back to the thoery board?
Death by bleeding
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:36 am
by captainmatt
I understand where you are coming from here, but in every April or July 61 scenario I have played as the South (about half a dozen), I have NEVER fought at Shiloh (where Johnston was mortally wounded).
So, as a possible compromise, I would suggest the following-
That for every MAJOR battle that A.S. Johnston is in, he has an ever increasing chance to be killed. Say 30% in the first major fight, 50% in the second big fight, 70% in the third and 90% in the fourth fight and in every battle after that.
What do you think?
- Capt. Matt
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:44 am
by pepe4158
His death was actually quite noble and could have been avoided by being less noble.
Death!a
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:29 am
by tagwyn
I just lost Gen. Buell to death? Will Thomas assume command? T

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:05 pm
by Gray_Lensman
deleted
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:46 pm
by soloswolf
My point was that he was there because you put him there. So it's not all his fault...
Further, I don't see any clamoring for Jackson's death, or any other quality officer's death. Johnston is fine, just set him up to succeed.
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:49 pm
by Paul Roberts
I like the fact that death for officers is a battlefield possibility rather than a scripted event. In fact I just had RE Lee get seriously wounded in a game, and I assume that he could just as easily have died. That would have been a real blow to the CSA.