A question about VP
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 9:32 pm
by Hobbes
Hi folks, just played the ToryIndian scenario and I am confused about why the Brit scenario instructions say that you should maintain control of Oswego as one of the conditions to win the game, but Oswego is not an objective or a strategic town. Also the "rebel" scenario instructions don't even mention Oswego as an important location. Shouldn't the rebel player be
told that Oswego is an important target? Why is it not an objective?
Cheers, Chris
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:44 am
by PhilThib
hmm,
an oversight of ours...thanks for spotting. It will be corrected with next patch.
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 10:45 am
by Henry D.
PhilThib wrote:hmm,
an oversight of ours...thanks for spotting. It will be corrected with next patch.
The one which was due yesterday?
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 12:42 pm
by Pocus
Hobbes wrote:Hi folks, just played the ToryIndian scenario and I am confused about why the Brit scenario instructions say that you should maintain control of Oswego as one of the conditions to win the game, but Oswego is not an objective or a strategic town. Also the "rebel" scenario instructions don't even mention Oswego as an important location. Shouldn't the rebel player be
told that Oswego is an important target? Why is it not an objective?
Cheers, Chris
Victory conditions text corrected in 1.07.