Louisburg/Quebec/Wolfe Experiences?
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 3:44 am
Has anyone playing as the French in the 1755/56 games had the Brits go after Louisburg or Quebec.....the latter in an effective manner?
I play that campaign all the time and the Brits don't try. Well, faily often Wolfe/Lawrence leads a big army across the snow from Halifax toward Quebec and they all die in the wilderness. But that's it. They never take the sea route.
I cut the regulars in L'burg by 1/2 to feed my offensives to Albany as a rule.....and keep a relatively small garrison in Quebec. Does the lack of large armies in these cities make them less suitable targets for the Brits, or does the fact that I invariably take Albany make the battles on the Hudson more important, so less emphasis on the other targets?
I play that campaign all the time and the Brits don't try. Well, faily often Wolfe/Lawrence leads a big army across the snow from Halifax toward Quebec and they all die in the wilderness. But that's it. They never take the sea route.
I cut the regulars in L'burg by 1/2 to feed my offensives to Albany as a rule.....and keep a relatively small garrison in Quebec. Does the lack of large armies in these cities make them less suitable targets for the Brits, or does the fact that I invariably take Albany make the battles on the Hudson more important, so less emphasis on the other targets?