Heldenkaiser wrote:I will scan through my books on the three wars this weekend (there will be more War of 1812, right?) and come up with some things. I'll have to check the existing traits first, of course.
"Reckless" would probably describe Braddock best. Unless we can up with something like "easily ambushed".
FM WarB wrote:It is my impression that lowering Brit Commanders' strategic ratings is a response to a percieved imbalance in favor of the Brits. Other changes, such as to American oob, and Brit supply capabilities might be looked at first. Lets not make in impossible for the Brits to win.
FM WarB wrote:It is my impression that lowering Brit Commanders' strategic ratings is a response to a percieved imbalance in favor of the Brits. Other changes, such as to American oob, and Brit supply capabilities might be looked at first. Lets not make in impossible for the Brits to win.
While Howe was slow to move strategically, this oft had to do with supply issues. On the battlefield, against a non dug in enemy he was always better than Washington. One may wonder if the Brits hadnt done Bunker Hill as they did, if they would have been bolder on Long Island.
Washington was NO Napoleon or Wellington, and should not be depicted as such.
FM WarB wrote:$Beloved_By_Army
$Superior_Withdrawer
$Brave
$Master_Spy NO...his reconnaisance and intelligence efforts were not good.
$Charismatic The problerms re-upping the army in the first two ys argue against this.
$Strong_Morale
$GoodSub_Cmd
$Training_Officer NO...other leaders, like Stueben did the training.
$Good_Admin_Army NO...The admin of the Continental army was too shabby.
$Very_Fast_Move
Heldenkaiser wrote:Thank you for your comments. Keep them coming. - I shall edit my first post in the thread to compile the suggestions.
Return to “BoA2: Wars in America”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests