gbs
Colonel
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:44 am

Pocus...wondering whats next..

Thu May 31, 2007 3:28 pm

I know you are busy but if you have a chance could you give a little detail on what you have concentrated your efforts on for the next patch. Thanks.

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25664
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:31 am

the main entry will be for the AI: +40% turn processing speed!

How the AI think has not be modified though, so she will have the same problems as before with some big stacks under commanded, but this will be one of the next thing to be worked. Add to that the regular demands (always justified, otherwise we would not do them :) ) on user interface improvements and some refinements to gameplay rules, and it means 100% of my time for AACW. ;)
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:41 am

Pocus wrote:the main entry will be for the AI: +40% turn processing speed!


Image
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE
Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[/CENTER]

User avatar
Doomwalker
Brigadier General
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:36 am
Location: Confederate held territory in Afghanistan.

Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:13 pm

Please tell me you meant -40% processing time. I would hate to know that you are working a patch to add more time to the AI turn processing. :tournepas

User avatar
Korrigan
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1982
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: France

Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:16 pm

That's what he meant: Turns should now be processed more quickly thanks to code optimisation. We felt this should please our customers who love to play solo against Athena the AI.

Best regards,

Korrigan
"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." Mark Twain

Image

User avatar
Doomwalker
Brigadier General
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:36 am
Location: Confederate held territory in Afghanistan.

Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:33 pm

Sweet, I look forward to its release. Speaking of, any idea as to when that will be?

User avatar
Spharv2
Posts: 1540
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 5:39 am
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:56 pm

Doomwalker wrote:Please tell me you meant -40% processing time. I would hate to know that you are working a patch to add more time to the AI turn processing. :tournepas


hehe...he didn't say +40% time, he said +40% speed. No worries. :)

flintlock
Captain
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:20 pm

Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:19 pm

Upcoming changes, as always, sound great! :sourcil:

tagwyn
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1220
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 4:09 pm

Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:00 pm

Pocus: Welcome back!! We love you and your wonderful company. Faster speeds please. How come my river gunboats sit quietly while Rebel steamers are all over the river? Larry3

goodwood
Lieutenant
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 3:28 pm
Location: Toongabbie Vic Oz

Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:48 pm

tagwyn wrote:Pocus: Welcome back!! We love you and your wonderful company. Faster speeds please. How come my river gunboats sit quietly while Rebel steamers are all over the river? Larry3


Tagwyn, a little off topic, but did you get that western scenario going?
Ron
Happily Grumpy:siffle:

Big Muddy

Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:42 am

only 40%, that's it :cool: , can't wait.

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25664
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:04 am

+40% speed is big, believe me optimization is a real pain in the rear work :)

update for wednesday (in beta patch format) if things goes well.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

goodwood
Lieutenant
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 3:28 pm
Location: Toongabbie Vic Oz

Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:46 am

Pocus wrote:+40% speed is big, believe me optimization is a real pain in the rear work :)

update for wednesday (in beta patch format) if things goes well.


Good lad, should be more like u in this industry, I tip me lid to ya :hat:
Happily Grumpy:siffle:

tagwyn
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1220
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 4:09 pm

Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:41 pm

Pocus: Are you planning to kill off certain generals: Jackson, Lyons, Johnston, et. al. This does not comport with your determination to give gamers a certain situation and then let us deal with it as best we can. True, certain generals might meet their Maker under that scenario, but so be it!! You shoud not kill them gratuitiously. Do you think? What if Lee/Grant/Sherman get killed!! What if Sheridan or Forrest get killed? Whiat happens! Don't do it!!! Let it happen Naturaly. Please. L3

User avatar
runyan99
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:34 am

Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:44 pm

tagwyn wrote:Pocus: Are you planning to kill off certain generals: Jackson, Lyons, Johnston, et. al.


Where is this coming from? Nobody ever said any such thing. I don't know what you are going on about.

User avatar
rickd79
Colonel
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Connecticut

Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:05 pm

Van Dorn (CSA) and Sickles (USA) are the only generals that can be "killed off" by a scripted event. Just to clarify, this is not certain (only a % chance)....so it may happen, it may not.

(Historically, Van Dorn was murdered by a jealous husband. Sickles was involved in enough shady situations where something similar certainly would have been a possibility.)

I believe there are a couple other situations in the game where generals can be removed. Breckinridge comes to mind, due to a "political controversy" or something similar.
None of the "all-stars" like Lee, Jackson, Grant, or Sherman are removed this way.

User avatar
denisonh
Captain
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:12 pm

rickd79 wrote:Van Dorn (CSA) and Sickles (USA) are the only generals that can be "killed off" by a scripted event. Just to clarify, this is not certain (only a % chance)....so it may happen, it may not.

(Historically, Van Dorn was murdered by a jealous husband. Sickles was involved in enough shady situations where something similar certainly would have been a possibility.)

I believe there are a couple other situations in the game where generals can be removed. Breckinridge comes to mind, due to a "political controversy" or something similar.
None of the "all-stars" like Lee, Jackson, Grant, or Sherman are removed this way.



Don't forget Porter, he can get cashiered in an event called "miscarriage of Justice", and take a division with him if he is in command! :p leure:

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25664
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Tue Jun 05, 2007 7:06 am

we added 2-3 events removing generals because of matters external to the war, but for flavor not because we believe a general killed at a given date should be removed from play. So no, you won't have historical death dates for generals in our games.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
Doomwalker
Brigadier General
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:36 am
Location: Confederate held territory in Afghanistan.

Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:00 pm

Is there a list on the forums that shows all the "hidden" stuff in the game; for example: Buildable Railroad (I could have sworn I saw somewhere that certain railroads could be built), and Generals deaths as suggested above?

Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests