I appreciate the encouragement everybody, thank you. I'm glad this has been helpful and hope it's been entertaining as well.
Tyler and I have decided to call it a game here. Basically every risk I've taken has swung my way, while Tyler's AGEOD experience bit him with the inconsistency in supply rules between games, and as a result he's been on the back foot since winter 1700. Tyler's a busy guy, and I can't ask him to continue to sink time into what seems to be an irredeemable position just for the sake of my war journal. When we get around to another campaign, we'll start fresh. With that said, if anyone would like to take on a challenge and try to turn things around for the Anti Swedish Coalition, I still have the files.
Liberty Bell wrote:Very realistic timing when Charles moving for Warsaw in mid 1702.
It's incredible how quick that army was, historically. iirc I hit Warsaw in 1704 in my first campaign vs AI. Not sure I could have kept this 1702 timetable if Tyler's armies had been healthy, it's probably too ambitious in normal circumstances. With the benefit of hindsight I think I could've made the Danzig-Thorn route work too, which is good because it gives the Swedes ahistorical options.
Temgesic wrote:Jag antar att du är svensk?
If your opponent admit defeat and you have noone to play a PBEM with i gladly step up and fill in the shoes and go to war against you! Just tell me if you want to play.
Nope, I'm American. I'm also looking for another opponent now, either to continue this game or start a new one, will PM you.