coolbean wrote:Thank you Lukas!
It looks like everything switched over normally. The only issue is the trade post should have remained in GB's hands, but I guess the change owner line moves everything over, not just the province control. That's ok, I can write a stand alone script that would destroy the US trade post and build a GB trade post. I know scripting is a touchy subject and I apologize for posting all of this about these scripts. And I apologize for needing a second one, but I think that one line makes a second stand alone script necessary.
lukasberger wrote:I'm pretty sure there was one other thing though, maybe China related. Just can't remember...
Lynxyonok wrote:China would love to finally get some more options and reforms, some more colonial options. The currently distributed reforms file points at Belgium. The current array of colonial options is inferior to that of Ottomans...
lukasberger wrote:Ok, can do on the reforms for sure. We might have to vote on the colonial stuff, any thoughts on that guys?
bjfagan wrote:I am fine fixing whatever reforms are incorrectly pointed to Belgium, but I am opposed to colonial options. This is exactly what was pointed at the beginning, that China should be limited in its options. This was not meant to be an open game where everyone has the exact same options, units and structures available to play.
De_Spinoza wrote:Question: according to patch v. 102's change log, you should be able to claim your nation's 'objective regions' in peace treaties, but this seems to be broken. I.e. no claimable region shows up when trying to make peace with Wallachia as Austria, even though Wallachia is part of the Austrian objective regions and it should thus be possible to acquire it in some way. At the moment this is impossible. Does anyone object to simply scripting the territorial transfer and peace?
bjfagan wrote:I personally have no problem scripting an end to Austria's seizing of an innocent little country and forcing them into the Austrian empire. :-)
What is the warscore? Maybe it needs to be higher.
lukasberger wrote:I think that's the right way to handle this.
btw, maybe we should re-institute the dropbox voting system from the old game for issues like this, or Chinese colonial options or whatever?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests