Leader Order

[paw1776]

AgeOd,

For the most part, do leaders follow this hiearchy.

1) [color="red"]British [/color]
2) [color="DarkOrange"]Colonial[/color]
3) [color="DarkRed"]Indian[/color]

This would seem consistent with the era.

So, a British [color="Red"]Colonel [/color]would lead a stack even though a Colonial [color="DarkOrange"]Maj. Gen.[/color] is in the stack.

Is this solely the based on Seniority on the leaders? Or something else?

I find this ok:
[color="Red"]Colonel [/color]Henri Bouquet (British) over [color="darkorange"]Maj. Gen. [/color]Phineas Lyman

I find it strange when:
[color="DarkRed"]Chief [/color]Sangarecha is leading [color="Red"]Colonel [/color]Sir William Johnson

[PhilThib]

At the moment not, unfortunately. The order is based on number of stars first, then hierarchy value within same rank...