Pocus wrote:I make a note on this thread, we will look at several NCP issues this week, despite WIA being just out.
Carnium wrote:Interesting .. also please check my report leure:
http://www.ageod-forum.com/showpost.php?p=82496&postcount=6
Carnium report
Tried a quick scenario (Last flight of the Eagle).
Whinyates Bty unit picture still not fixed
the French AI is "strange". I managed to win in 3 turns by doing practically nothing :
FIRST TURN : re-ordered my troops so that the leader penalty for all corps is gone and gave them the defensive stance. AI sends all troops to Bruxelles and attacks it.
Three huge battles occur where he looses cca 80.000 men ( + 18.000 POWs) and gets a huge NM hit.
SECOND TURN : sending my troops that still have more or less intact units toward Lille. Two battles occur and at the turn end the AI has 101.000 casualties and 19.000+ POWs.
THIRD TURN : all out attack (instead of besieging ) Lille. AI has 108.000 casualties, 20.000 POWs.
GAME OVER
My total losses were cca 51.000 casualties. Score 540 vs 20.
No time to play more today as it is kinda late
Carnium wrote:Interesting .. also please check my report leure:
http://www.ageod-forum.com/showpost.php?p=82496&postcount=6
FM WarB wrote:Bear in mind, turn one is June 8-15. The Battles of Ligny and Quatre Bras were June 16.
With the map as is, it's tough to get an accurate Anglo-Allied deployment. I propose moving the City of Bruxelles one region northeast to current region Louvain. Rename Bruxelles region Mons. With this change, general deployments as follows:
A-A II Corps, Frederick Corps, Cav Corps (-) Mons; A-A I and Reserve Corps and Army HQ Bruxelles. Siege arty, Lambert's Brit Bde, and Hanoverian Res Corps further back.
Prussian I Korps Charleroi, II and III Korps with Blucher Army HQ Namur and IV Korps Liege.
Pocus wrote:Sorry to disapoint some of you, but when I say I'll look at NCP, it means I'll look at gameplay/AI bugs and issues, and not if there are errors in OOB. I'm not knowledged enough in Napoleon era to tweak them, nor I have the time to do that. It is more a work for people I tag as 'The Historical Team'.
FM WarB wrote:I have not seen Clash of Arms......
Nikel wrote:I think that you two, jastaV and FM WarB should join NCP improvement team!
Maybe I am wrong but I think that with 'The Historical Team', Pocus is referring to a part of AGEOD team (PhilThib included), not the volunteers that form NCP improvement team.
Pocus wrote:By Historical Team I mean PhilThib, which is routinely 150% busy (so he intervenes on small historical fixes, as you saw on the PW Campaign) and Volunteers.
We are at the third iteration of volunteers for NCP. It seems like a curse, they all disappears in a matter of weeks each time. So there is perhaps only 2 persons still listed on our rosters as volunteers for NCP, and they are already very busy in real life to commit on anything major.
In conclusion, you will be welcome to recreate the 'Napoleon Improvement Team, Iteration 4'
jastaV wrote:I'll take charge to collect deployement and OOB data for Last flight of the Eagle, accordint to the term I reported:......see Emperor Returns.
Anyway I have not experience of AGEOD program modding so somebody has to convers data into NCP files.
JastaV
Pocus wrote:That's a bit the crux of the problem. We find volunteers that have ideas or can provide docs and details on OOBs, but when it comes to actually doing the setup with the AGE syntax, there is a lack of motivation.
So for the Team #4 to succeed, you have to find people willing to mod setups.
FM WarB wrote:I have the mod advice files, and have started perusing the latest database files, thankyou.
It probably is not important enough to add the missing 11 and 12 Prussian Bde leaders, with possible necessary new unit files. I dont want to mess with adding new models or leaders just yet in any case; changing setup files with what's available is a good first step.
Return to “Help to improve NCP!”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests