Objectives and AI performance: a question

[jastaV]

I suppose Objectives edited for a campaign could influence AI planning and AI moves execution, in so far I assume AI should try to gain control of campaign objectives, expecially if they are worth many NM points!

If that is true, changing Objects in a campaign could change the grand strategy plan AI will try to execute.

For example, in a campaign set over a quite large theater, spreaded omogeneously with Objects, AI will spawn own armies in the effort to conquest as much objectives as posible.
On the contrary, when Objectives are set over a quite narrow map area I expect to see AI to concentrate own armies to move on the objective rich sector.

Thanks in advance for clarifications as regard!

JastaV

[jastaV]

Did not get anwers here, but it seems like my supposition is working......

[lodilefty]

..and if it helps, you can switch on or switch off strategic cities {VP=1} by event during the campaign...

[jastaV]

..and if it helps, you can switch on or switch off strategic cities {VP=1} by event during the campaign...

Had a doubt, just now?

Is the VP columns admitting only VP=0 or VP=1, just to mark regions VP worth in a scenery?
......Or May we also try VP=2, or even superior, to mark a very important and VPs rich region?
...... BTW, some VP=2 regions have bene edited into Germany 1813 Hist mod ver 2.06.