AGEOD Forums

Stauffenberg

Hi Leibst thanks for replying. I think you'll agree that a few corrections on critical RRs will really improve things by way of historical accuracy. Here's what I see: 1) The RR spur heading SW from Madrid should carry on to Talavera, which should be a level 4-5 city, and then on to Caceras followin...

Stauffenberg

ERISS wrote:Don't know. The dev wanted to make another patch some years ago.
The here ageod forum you write should however be the best to ask, as it is aimed by the official game webpage.
http://headquarter.es/wp/?page_id=14#

Merci bien.

Stauffenberg

I just started a campaign game and immediately notice this ongoing problem. Colonel Alavarez-Rementeria (NAC) in Sevilla has no face portrait, just a blank. I've read the threads on this and this issue goes back to 2016 at least: why is it not fixed? Another issue I brought up last year was this egr...

Stauffenberg

It is a really weird and non-intuitive solution, but such is the nature of things. Non-intuitive is the phrase that sums it up. They do such a brilliant job with historical research for these gems, I guess they have to muck it up somewhere. But really, an easy universal game to game pbem set-up wou...

Stauffenberg

Durk wrote:For shared hosting, just send everything including your own replay file.

That seems to have solved it Durk thank-you.

Stauffenberg

That may be it thanks. I've been sending everything but the replay files. I'll advise.

Stauffenberg

Well that helps. We're likely just mucking up with files and directories. I'll keep at it.
We're starting the 1755 campaign scenario (#8).

Stauffenberg

I'm used to convoluted pbem issues with this game system, game by game, but have hit the wall with BoA2 since the WIA patch was installed. We've tried regular and dual hosting to no avail. Anyone have any advice?

Stauffenberg

It can't be too hard to get it to display the correct version number can it? Looking in the credits mine still says version 1.0; even though the patch installer said installation successful. God I'm glad you guys don't program avionics; or do you? Well said. This issue seems to go way back into pre...

Stauffenberg

I played out the 1645 scenario as the Parliamentarians and got the victory screen, albeit a minor victory.

Stauffenberg

There is a Royalist Commission that can be played for Oxford on Turn 1 but it seems to have 0% chance of happening (I replayed it 15 times). A simple tweak could make this high probability or a certainty. Royalist loyalty is 24%, Parliamentarian 26%, Neutral 51%. One wonders how accurate this is. Wh...

Stauffenberg

There is a Royalist Commission that can be played for Oxford on Turn 1 but it seems to have 0% chance of happening ( I replayed it 15 times). A simple tweak could make this high probability or a certainty. Royalist loyalty is 24%, Parliamentarian 26%, Neutral 51%. One wonders how accurate this is; i...

Stauffenberg

Looking for an opponent to play the Whites. If interested give me a shout.

Stauffenberg

I've run this patch through four times and the Pressburg trigger appears to be blown: --France sends peace offer through Laws and Decrees --Austrian response in Laws and Decrees appears with prefix: opt_title_AUS_PeaceOfPressburg --if manually accepted Austria gets back all initial locations (no ter...

Stauffenberg

I'm not out to be captious with a project I very much admire; that said however, the great attention to historical detail you can see throughout Espańa 1936 is marred by some significant RR map errors. Many of these can be seen when compared with this German 1921 map of existing Spanish railways: ht...

Stauffenberg

The reason the Nationalists were able to drive on Toledo so quickly in 1936 was their use of the Madrid-Badajoz railway which passed through the important large town/small city of Talavera del Tajo (Talavera). This important RR is missing from the SCW map thus making it difficult (but not impossible...

Stauffenberg

Yes probably my settings, thanks.

Stauffenberg

Apparently a CW II update was stopped by malwarebytes with attached trojans today. Has anyone had this?

Stauffenberg

Yes and he had intended to move earlier and head south. Two final factors closed the door for Lee: his horses were too weak to pull guns and wagons with heavy mud and he was waiting for the land to dry out; and secondly the infamous CSA supply train for his army that failed to appear when he finally...

Stauffenberg

I may have found the source: https://bi.hcpdts.com/reflowable/scroll ... 0062029201 I've found several indications that he was quoted in a newspaper article which circulated around Virginia and North Carolina, maybe even as far reaching as Cincinnati, in July 1881. But access to the online copies o...

Stauffenberg

A good question and I don't have Furguson's book on Richmond during the war. One might assume it was made during the period of the siege in 64-65, but it could really apply to any period he was fighting to defend Richmond, even back to the Peninsula campaign. So I don't know. As well: "reported...

Stauffenberg

A fine article on Grant:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... y-man.html

Stauffenberg

To the People of the Confederate States of America. Danville, Va., April 4, 1865. For many months the largest and finest army of the Confederacy, under the command of a leader whose presence inspires equal confidence in the troops and the people, has been greatly trammeled by the necessity of keepi...

Stauffenberg

Yes and a Confederate victory often involves finally moving the capital out of Richmond later in the war and fighting on. When Lee capitulated the CSA still controlled a huge area and a more effective strategy would have been that of trading some of this space for time; i.e.moving the capital back t...

Stauffenberg

You're right, I just checked and found various saved games from earlier iterations there though not my most recent before the upgrade. I had quite forgotten about that. It's been a few years since I've been into CW II; a few ACW gift books at Xmas have rekindled my passion for the subject, not to me...

Stauffenberg

That must have been it.

Stauffenberg

who would want a game balanced and both sides equal? we want history. So adjust the winning conditions.... Exactly. The major draw of this ACW model is the rich historical detail, leaving room for vastly different strategies and varied results every full campaign game. I've never been a stickler fo...

Stauffenberg

It's not a big deal but I believe the fix ran an uninstall and wiped the Save folder clean as one would expect. It caught me by surprise as I simply used the Update function on the game menu to get the new patch.

Stauffenberg

Good to see an upgrade.

A quick attempt seems to indicate that saved games in progress from the earlier iteration will be lost--is this the case?

Stauffenberg

Thanks. NM problems with v. 1.02 noted, I suppose I will stick with 1.01 for now to see how that shakes out, or...?

Search found 547 matches

Re: 1.02 Missing General Portraits Still Not fixed? + Missing critical RR

Re: 1.02 Missing General Portraits Still Not fixed? + Missing critical RR

1.02 Missing General Portraits Still Not fixed? + Missing critical RR

Re: PBEM issues (as usual)

Re: PBEM issues (as usual)

Re: PBEM issues (as usual)

Re: PBEM issues (as usual)

PBEM issues (as usual)

Re: Wars of Succession has been updated to version 1.01

Re: The Never Ending Story

Re: New patch ?

Re: A useful House Agreement

PBEM anyone?

Re: WON Public Beta patch February 24th - 2017

Re: Madrid - Talavera RR Map Error

Madrid - Talavera RR Map Error

Re: CW II Update malware report

CW II Update malware report

Re: Can the CSA actually win?

Re: Can the CSA actually win?

Re: Can the CSA actually win?

U.S. Grant Is U.S. History’s Mystery Man - James A Warren

Re: Can the CSA actually win?

Re: Can the CSA actually win?

Re: Civil War II has been updated to version 1.6.3!

Re: Civil War II has been updated to version 1.6.3!

Re: Can the CSA actually win?

Re: Civil War II has been updated to version 1.6.3!

Re: Civil War II has been updated to version 1.6.3!

Re: Queries on the game rules