AGEOD Forums

GShock

That's a smart move Pocus, this lets us teach the AI a basic deep-thinking strategic capability based on realistic and historical strategies.

GShock

bigus wrote:I understand your frustration Soja.

Who doesn't...we all more or less were in his shoes...sometimes, i still am!

GShock

I understand your concerns but you should be a little more open-minded on the abstraction behind even such a detailed wargame such as AACW is. The fact a Corps is in a neighbouring region doesn't mean he's 20 km away, it means it could also be on the border between the 2 regions involved and arrive ...

GShock

c'est l'homme!

GShock

The manual says so.

(9.10)

GShock

Use them to do the blockade directly on port and u will cause serious damage to the other side. Check blockade factors in each zone adjacent to the port and see how many elements you need. Once u blockade it, that port will produce no supplies.

GShock

Ok, next patch i see i will toss some coins in my debit card.

GShock

Is it possible to see an AAR for this game?

GShock

Before i forget: Have u considered the possibility, when a general is killed or dies from illness, to add: 1) Capture of a low ranking general (and eventual exchange with prisoners). 2) death of *** generals affecting NM. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ...

GShock

aaaaaaa so he's one of those who fought the mexicans?

GShock

(6.3)

Am surprised about the promotion system...the mannual states there's no such promotion system as seen in other ageod games but well....there is.

GShock

All correct and no, they can't help against epidemics.

GShock

Is this BOA1 ?

GShock

He's got to be ageless really...Man, this guy is the foundation of the State...i didn't know, i'm surprised to learn that. So not only he was the youngest in the independence war but also the oldest in the civil war later on. Jesus i can't imagine the awe and respect of serving under a general who k...

GShock

Is he the old man Scott in AACW too? Same general?

GShock

Second best, straight after tutorials, i learned the game via scenarios and i refused to tackle the campaign before i was sure everything was in my grasp...It took me 4 months. ...and yet i was hit hard by the complexity of the game at my first campaign. The steep learning curve gives the best resul...

GShock

What matters is to damage or sink the ships and the ROE settings help to withdraw in case of failure. Send the ship(s) back to repair and then try again. Even just damaging the enemy ships might force the AI or opponent to send the ship back to repairs, which translates in loss of EP for the british.

GShock

Gray_Lensman wrote:And for the 10482330 time, you'll have to ask Clovis' to accomodate the requirements for "officialization".

I have...every now and then i poke him with these subliminal messages

GShock

U don't lose the war if you lose a general even if you lose Grant or Lee (i play small randomization so it's not a a perfect statement), but surely i have for example never been able to promote a 2** to 3*** due to lack of experience on the field. If you lose a 3*** but can promote a 2** to three, t...

GShock

Uninstall, delete all WIA folder, reinstall 1.0 and wait a bit

GShock

RE-apply the fix suggested by RtG and do not re-patch until Hok says it's green light.

GShock

Provided removal and comeback are both visible in the log, the solution stands, but in case you want to consider illness as reason for death coupled with inability to really kill 3*** generals, the comeback date of 2125 seems good enough to me as an alternate solution

GShock

It's WAD bc it's how basically most boards are programmed and in most circumstances it's working good. I think we're looking for the needle in the straw, the system is perfectly balanced even as it is. I mean, we really are pushing it towards the total perfection but it's already ok. All of this for...

GShock

I know having to say Yes-no to all rep changes is a pain, so i think that probably Nikel's statement is the best management-wise. This only leaves the rep system in the hands of the team and makes it very reliable. The only tradeoff is that community is stripped off this function...my view is use by...

GShock

No korrigan the job of the admin would not be to judge on the motivation but to judge whether the submitted motivation would be appropriate with the posts. I.E. u don't have to agree/disagree (this is judgement on "merit") you'd only have to validate (judgement on "legitimacy"). It is essentially li...

GShock

Maybe the rep. system should only allow changes if motivation is added and only if the admin of the boards validates it (so he can make sure the motivation is applicable)....in that case it would be very reliable.

GShock

I saw in AACW as CSA that building forts would be a key to defense. The issue comes with the fact that the fortification is built when you build it but, contextually to the disappearing of guns and supply wagons, the fort doesn't come autoequipped with fort batteries. Which means, if i build a fort ...

GShock

Visibility is essentially the biggest exploit of Matrix as publishers. Thousands of wargamers over there...all forums in list each of those players plays multiple wargames. It will take some time before everyone is aware of this release maybe it's not a bad thing after all, we can make the game even...

GShock

It does indeed allow you a wide variety of tactics...take a look at the Grand Campaign thread and the AARs.

Again: The most important thing to remember with deployment is that the target region must be at least with 25% Military Control for the redeployment order to succeed.

GShock

Perhaps i am mistaken but if ships are parked in the harbor they don't participate to the fight even if they appear in the battle report screen. In other words they are just sitting there. The same is with gunboats whose support is limited to the amphibious invasions and don't participate to ground ...

Search found 877 matches