What about and option to made the french Egypt campaign a succes with an alliance between France and Ottoman empire??? they can attack the soft belly of Rusia and/or send troops to distract forces from AH empire when France need it... and well, with Ottomans you have to a not very strong allie that ...
Vicentius, i know is not a Lebel... but doesnt looks like a Berthier... to be fair it looks a lot like a Mauser 1898, look the but, near the trigger, is like the hump on this model.
A little clue :niark: [video=youtube;oH6mw2Rc3DQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH6mw2Rc3DQ&feature=kp[/video] And returning to thread... Jackie: The South African baboon soldier :thumbsup: http://wildlifetv.wordpress.com/2013/08/19/jackie-baboon-south-african-world-war-i/ jackie.jpg
I think Oompa Loompas are to expensive and traps alone are not fun enough... i think a classic thunderdome works better, 2 guys enter 1 betatester leave
But people support this expeditionary forces??? NM is Nation and send troops fight for others ... apart moment is very important, if you suffer a lot of casualties, your NM is reducing turn by turn send troops to fight for others sure doesnt help, again one thing is send troops to help an allied and...
I refer to the nation sending troops to fight in other fronts out of their interest... think that NM is out of "elite" as german or UK or french i dont see very well send troops to help others... for example France 1917 sending troops to help italians... one thing is die for France in France other o...
Interesting point... maybe something that need AGEOD in future games where a side has more than 1 nation is a way to move between diferent nations to control better resources, performance (i am curious about how is the report screen... i want know how many soldiers send my troops from X nation to th...
Some times is a question of luck, for example in a game i reproduce a bug that developers were searching for months... same in betas, is incredible how certain bugs survive even under hundreds of eyes until they miss their camo... Usually single player offer more beta time, multiplayer is harder if ...
Interesting, i plan try Rusia in a team game... if i can do a decent rate... 3-5 turns per week. The point in Rusia is how good could be the use of russian resources... more than use a mass create a little better army with lower effectives, some armies are better in reduced numbers than historical t...
I remember a photo in a book i have where you can see dog traction used for small supply wagons in AH army... the most interesting thing is the muzzle all nations use for dogs, very heavy and usually metalic looks like all nations know the problems with hydrophobia and i think read something about u...
Interesting points... specially the Rusia scorched earth point... i dont think this could be critical for CP, think that they only want Rusia doesnt take their rear, if they defeat Rusia in initial battles with a lot of casualties and i doubt rusians retreat soon because oposite to 1812 they need co...
I think in 1st Marne (5/9) or Tannenberg (26/8) but there are many battles in august-september ... even i can add the Siege of Przemyśl (24/9) the longest siege in war. I doubt use the date of a battle over 1914 is ok, if game release was in 1918... lets delay 4 years the game to correct this :...
Well, Rusia in 1914 was stronger than many think BUT only for a short fight, after 2 years facing full CP it can breaks easy, is like a tank, secure until something pen it... you dont need destroy Rusia, you need simple break it and they cant recover.... apart this AH sure suffer a lot less casualti...
Well, i am to a pro-east strategy, central powers wining east in 1916 (not imposible if they are defensive in west something that made unusefull attack Belgium that maybe delay UK enter in war a few months) sure prevent Romania and Italy go to entente (I never understand why central powers dont try ...
Well, germans fight with the weapons and in the situation they have... we know now that a defensive strategy was wrong, in the end they surrender with not a full use of his navy. Diplomacy was horrible for germans, they fight in 2 land fronts and in the end they need fight to control a gate in north...
But in 1914-1915 RN needs cover a lot of seas... think that they ask to japan for help in Mediterranean... and send here DDs and the AH navy was on the bottle from the first day. The question is that in the North sea in the early part of war RN was not very superior to germany, an agresive use of na...
Well, better than use a defensive strategy... VS UK that use same strategy, UK has the numbers but more to block, i refer to win fast war to prevent the final situation that face central powers... use teh navy first year all they can is necesary to try win ASAP. I never think UK even with no german ...
I think oposite, Germans need try win in sea, they have a navy to fight and negate UK blockage... is like be inside a fortress with 50.000 soldiers siege by 70.000 that can receive reinforcements... or you take iniciative or you fall yes or yes. Even if Germany fail to defeat UK at least they try it...