AGEOD Forums

denisonh

Thanks Bohemond! I am tracking now. Forgot about the website.

denisonh

Thanks

denisonh

Already did that. Nothing since 29 August.

denisonh

I pre ordered on 29 August via PayPal and have never received download instructions (or a serial or key). I did recieve an email indicating that I should download a patch into my game today?!

I installed it but the game doesn't run.

The attachment PayPalReciept.jpg is no longer available

Please help!

Thanks

denisonh

They are posted in the Paradox forums under the tech support sub forum.

denisonh

Well, a $20 investment upfront is not all that much given the level of support provided, so DLCs seem to be the way to fiscally support continued support for the game. If you write this way its sound like good way, but it have little feel of milking to me. I will rather see expansion with more scena...

denisonh

Added a leader into the GC without modifying the scenario file. Did the following: Create Model files - Created additional leader model(.mdl files) files 11276-11279 (general 1/2/3). Must either edit cached file (topic unto itself) or delete it. - (I edited it) Create Unit files - Created additional...

denisonh

Still looking for an opponent?

denisonh

It is my curse really. I only enjoy playing against other live, thinking, breathing entities (in all my pc games). I am dying to pick up and play my ageod games again, but without any sort of pbem security, it unfortunately always ends up with my opponent hosting and playing "surprisingly" perfect....

denisonh

How about the CSA operating in Southern Illinois with the Ohio blockaded for a year?

What does it take in terms of riverene units to block flow of supply?

denisonh

Paul Roberts wrote:That's all good news! I'm glad to hear that we have much to look forward to.

Thanks!

Ditto!

denisonh

True. And yet, 8 cannons firing with +14% chance to hit will score more hits than 6 guns with +42% to hit. Bigger simply *is* better, and artillery is the king :) Depends on the base chance to hit. You are right if the base chance is greater than 70%, otherwise the expected value for number of hits...

denisonh

Quite simple. When posting something like the above post and obviously wanting an explanation of some sort, POST the saved game files if you expect to have any real action taken into looking into reasons/explanations as to why something occured. It's been stated quite frequently throughout the foru...

denisonh

Gray_Lensman wrote:Another meaningless post without the saved game files.

Thanks for the commentary Gray.

Since I am not hosting, I have asked my opponent to take a look provide the complete save as required.

I assume that just the USA turn would be of no use, so it is hard to post what I do not have.

denisonh

Here is a result that I found rather unbelievable: http://www.ageod-forum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6386&stc=1&d=1236393361 Lee is trapped in Washington with an Army 10 times as powerful. The Potomac is blacked by 4+ naval elements and Union has all the neighboring regions with more than 50% M...

denisonh

Gray - I don't think denisonh was arguing that the raids should stop, and I know I wasn't. Raids, even deep ones, were a historical part of the war, and they are also a fun aspect of the game, up to a point. But it sometimes seems to get out of hand. My complaint is not that raids happen, but that ...

denisonh

It is. Any corps/armies in defensive stance get a -10% to their roll. Stance is one thing, RoE is another. I think that RoE should be an impact on ability to "march to the guns", as a force set to disengage on contact should be less likely to seek it! If a stack is set to disengage or "hold at all ...

denisonh

we re-ran the turn and Dix was given rail movement orders that lowered the time to 4. We had similar results. The battle occurred on day 7 and Dix was already in Manassas by then, so he had to have marched to the sound of the guns. Seems so. Maybe" march to the sound of the guns" needs to be affect...

denisonh

Squarian - I basically agree with everything you said, but would still like to see the effectiveness of deep raids toned down. I think it's too easy for raiders to stay supplied, and they move quickly enough that they are difficult to catch or chase away. I'm in favor of seeing the rules tweaked in...

denisonh

I think it was the frontage bonus to the CSA that gave them the victory. The USA has McDowell has their army leader so Hamilton could have penalties to all his stats or at best unmodified, while in Sept 62 Lee would be the Army commander for the CSA. The battle report only shows their unmodified st...

denisonh

Also, if he was the only commander active they usually take the brunt of the attack. I've especially noticed this with HQs stacked with corps. The HQ divisions usually won't engage. Be careful that you have 10% military-controlled territory to retreat to and that the enemy ZOC isn't blocking you. B...

denisonh

Based on discussion with my opponent, here is what I postulate what happened: 1. The battle began on day 4 and ended on day 7. 2. CSA marched to the guns with an additonal 1-2 Corps and Army Stack 3. The reckless trait for a division commander affects the entire Corps keeping Dix from retreating unt...

denisonh

The following battle result occured in the early Sep 1862 turn of a PBEM in version 1.13b with the Kentucky Add on. CSA NM 103 USA NM of 98 http://www.ageod-forum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6005&d=1234115555 The entire Corps under Dix is destroyed to an element and the CSA loses not even a sing...

denisonh

" A side thought, but an interesting observation/question: I'm wondering how many players are taking every possible unit they build and piling it into forward armies or the East theatre only to sit in DC without moving into Virginia until as Pocus says "the stars are properly aligned", and then are...

denisonh

[color="SlateGray"]Looking for a Brit opponent for the 1775 campaign.[/color]

Opponent found

denisonh

Hmmm, it could be that I was very interested in a leader with stats that low and how he could ever be activated if he really did have permanent stats as low as 0-0-1. Had they actually been that low permanently, it would possibly have required some beta thought. Since you think there might be more ...

denisonh

Gray, It could be I happened to observe him on a turn after I had redeployed him him. My bad. Excuse my impertinance, but aren't there more pressing issues for you to expend your efforts on? denisonh: Where are you coming up with McClellan stats as 0-0-1 ? In the vanilla models his stats are 1-1-2 f...

denisonh

Regarding the probability of Kentucky seceeding. If I understand correctly, there is a 25% each turn Kentucky joins the South, as long as South has enough troops along the border. That means the chance for Kentucky joining South is 1-(0.75^7) which is about 86.6%. There is nothing the USA can do ab...

denisonh

The Kentucky Neutral Add-On does in fact inhibit the formation of both sides' divisions until 1861/10/01 for both the Kentucky Add-On scenarios. This is ONLY in effect for the Kentucky Add-On versions of the April and July scenarios, and not for either of the vanilla April/July scenarios. This mean...

denisonh

I propose you to recalculate all your EXCEL considering 2 aspects, as told in Dixicrat thread. 1.- Ignore MONEY for your analysis. Just count WAR SUPPLY costs, the real limiting factor. 2.-Consider another line with 6 lbs as 12 lbs. These upgrade at a fast ratio in the long term campaign. By march ...

Search found 196 matches

Pre Ordered, never recieved download instructions or a serial/key

Adding in a Leader

AACW Yankee

Unusual Battle Result

Initial Analysis

Massive Lopsided Battle Result

Wia Pbem