Pocus wrote:I thought the tooltip said it eased slightly acceptance of further treaties? In any case, that's its use

Ah, I see. Maybe the tooltip only shows for the nation that is sending the treaty? Otherwise, I might just be missing it somehow. Thanks for the help!

Simple question: What does this do? The UK is offering it to me, what are the effects from accepting it?

Correct me if I am mistaken, but I do not think there is any tooltip that explains this. Nor is it mentioned in the manual.

I'm sorry, but there is too much in this post that just doesn't add up. First of all, the release weeks are not "wasted." A lot of us have had fun, we've found problems with a VERY complicated game that the devs are going to fix, tomorrow, I think I saw in another thread...less than two weeks after...

The release version is unpolished and very rough in a lot of places. Is it unplayable? No. Does it have a lot of potential? Yes, of course. Should games be sold on potential alone? No, not really. I look forward to this game becoming more polished and more enjoyable, but it is sad to see the release...

In the January 1805 start, Hannover is free and not occupied by France. However, according to the first source I could find (Wikipedia), Hannover was occupied since 1803. The Convention of Artlenburg was the official surrender of Hannover, and the French only withdrew in Autumn 1805 to fight the Aus...

Small thoughts, I am not following that AAR. Regarding the huge NM loss/gain in naval battles: this is a design decision in all modern-era AGEOD games. It is kind of historically accurate. Naval battles were much rarer but their effect in morale was probably much higher. That's the most I can say a...

I was able to send the Austrian navy, on passive/retreat/evade, to Germany in a game versus the AI. I got "caught" once in the Mediterranean and hurt a British fleet severely for no significant casualties. This could just be the stupid AI, or it could be that navies are pretty good at evading anythi...