I tend to build corps (divisions in ACW 2 terms) composed of 2 infantry divisions (when you build them, 1 division = 2 Inf reg + 1 field art reg) and 2 med or field art. Which gives 1 corps = 4 inf/mil regiments and 4 artillery. Stack two corps like these with a ** general and you have a nice indepe...

I think the "must be in chain of command" for corps is just a leftover from ACW 2 were corps are the equivalent of armies in TEAW. My corps, where ever they are, give always 24 command points, which is nice since one corp=12 CP. My typical corp is thus two corsp stack together, which is very efficie...

I'm also reading with interest. But as I'm new to this game mechanism, I can't help you out :) A simple question though: You seem to win a lot of victories over CP - do you feel that the game isn't balanced? Well I think it must in part be due do the fact that with France, going through Belgium or ...

I am not so far too bothered by the fact that one cannot play the two sides. However, wouldn't it be nice if as one side, we could be notified with cool event texts of major things happening? For example, as France-Great Britain, I would like to be informed of things like "Warsaw has fallen into the...

Ace wrote:All stacks commanded by ** generals will MTSG (They are Corps attached to nearest Army without the trouble of manually attaching anything)

Does that mean that I need an additional ** leader if my corps is composed of two corps merged with division (I do not know if I'm being clear)?